Download Aëtiana: Studies in the doxographical traditions of ancient by Jaap Mansfeld, David T. Runia PDF

By Jaap Mansfeld, David T. Runia

Show description

Read Online or Download Aëtiana: Studies in the doxographical traditions of ancient philosophy volume 118 PDF

Similar ancient books

Archaeology and Biblical Interpretation

Those are intriguing instances for all these occupied with the background of historic Israel, Judaism, and early Christianity, for the previous few many years have visible an unheard of quantity of scholarly paintings upon either textual and artifactual facts. a transparent figuring out of the connection among archaeology and literary fabric is important for students who desire to reconstruct the historical past of rising Israel.

Ophiolites: Ancient Oceanic Lithosphere?

I used to be invited to write down this publication as a part of the Minerals, Rocks and natural fabrics sequence of Springer-Verlag by way of Professor Peter J. Wyllie in 1974. Ophiolites have preoccupied me ever on the grounds that 1948 as a graduate scholar and as much as the current time as a part of my study with the U. S. Geological Survey.

Additional info for Aëtiana: Studies in the doxographical traditions of ancient philosophy volume 118

Example text

Too literally, where Cicero seems to say that his works are mere “transcripts”; Madvig missed the irony, and the text moreover is corrupt. g. Schäfer , –. 68 Cf. Jaeger ,  n. . 69 Boyancé ; Harder . M. g. in his  paper). 70 Note the perceptive remarks of Dyck , –. 71 Of course it is: here we do have an equally complicated extant text (though there are important gaps in the papyrus) which corresponds as to the details. e. in parallel columns, and he was not the first scholar to detect the undeniable correspondences.

Of the earth, or of the soul and its parts 81 Cicero’s account too is not doxographical. Also emphasized by Runia (above, n. ) whom he does not cite. 83 Cf. the overview at §  above. I note in passing that this analysis is accepted by Lachenaud , – as well (for a reference see  n. ). 84 Lévy , ,  with n.  (but he has noticed that Phd. b is cited at my a,  n. ). Sacr. (cf. Thdrt. Affect. ). 85 Cf. also above at n. . 86 Cf. Lévy , . 82 doxographical studies, quellenforschung  or faculties, and so on.

Repr. in: O. ), Eduard Zellers Kleine Schriften Bd. , Berlin , –. Zeller  = E. Zeller, Die Philosophie der Griechen in ihrer geschichtlichen Entwicklung Bd. –, Leipzig 5. chapter two PHYSIKAI DOXAI AND PROBLÊMATA PHYSIKA IN PHILOSOPHY AND RHETORIC: FROM ARISTOTLE TO AËTIUS (AND BEYOND) Jaap Mansfeld I. Plutarch’s On the Physical Tenets Accepted by the Philosophers, Five Books —usually latinized as Placita philosophorum rather than as Placita physica—and substantial excerpts concerned with natural philosophy to be found in Stobaeus’ Eclogae physicae and Theodoret’s Treatment of Greek Diseases derive from a common source.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.28 of 5 – based on 16 votes